| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Finally, you can manage your Google Docs, uploads, and email attachments (plus Dropbox and Slack files) in one convenient place. Claim a free account, and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) can automatically organize your content for you.

View
 

Publications on the MMAT

This version was saved 2 years, 11 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by Quan Nha HONG
on July 6, 2018 at 9:30:47 am
 

version 2018

  • TBC

 

version 2011 (efficiency, reliability and usefulness testing)

  • Souto, R., Khanassov, V., Hong, Q.N., Bush, P., Vedel, I., Pluye, P. (2015). Systematic mixed studies reviews: updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1): 500-501. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.010 
  • Souto QR, Khanassov V, Pluye P, Hong QN, Bush P, Vedel I (June 28, 2014). Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews: Reliability Testing of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Mixed Methods International Research Association Conference (MMIRA), Boston, USA. 
  • Hong, Q. N., Gonzalez-Reyes, A., & Pluye, P. (2018). Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(3), 459-467.  

 

Pilot version (efficiency and reliability testing) - version 2011

 

Initial version (content validation) - version 2009

  •  Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F & Johnson-Lafleur J (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4):529-546. 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.